IN Intermediate Finals

Percentage Points System (PPS) Statistics

The Percentage Points System (PPS) only calculates statistics based on performance up to the point at which a game is locked. This new way to calculate statistics for teams and quizzers is an attempt to more fairly represent their performance at a tournament. Credit for the PPS statistics concept goes to Chad Nash, Ryan O'Neil, and Calvin Fisher, who have been discussing and calculating these statistics since 2005.
See the PPS summary page for more information.

Results posted: June 3, 2017 6:31:29 PM EDT

IN Intermediate Finals
06-03-2017
New Whiteland
10 Teams

Top 3 Teams

Rank	Team	Wins	Losses	Avg PPG	PPS EA
1st	Hobart / Kokomo	5	1	181.667	213.810
2nd	New Whiteland	6	2	171.250	196.964
3rd	Danville 1	2	2	20.000	23.352

PPS Highest Scoring Individuals and PPS All Tournament Team represent those quizzers who performed the best while games were still competitive. These quizzers are honored here for their outstanding performance.

** Projected PPG scores are the PPG that a quizzer would likely have achieved if the quiz had continued competitively after the quiz was locked. **
Projected PPG is calculated by taking the percent of total points that a quizzer earns before a quiz is locked and projecting that percent across the points remaining after the lock. Whether a quizzer would quiz out is also a factor used in calculating projected PPG. Since most quizzers stop quizzing competitively when a quiz is locked out of courtesy to the other team, the Projected PPG rankings honor these quizzers for their excellent quizzing and sportsmanship.

PPS Highest Scoring Individuals by Projected PPG (top 2 from top 3 teams)

1st Highest	-	Benjamin Stirnemann		New Whiteland (2nd)		92.323 projected PPG
2nd Highest	-	Shanyah Plummer		Hobart / Kokomo (1st)		88.448 projected PPG

PPS All Tournament Team by Projected PPG (all must have at least 2 wins)

1) Austin Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	80.106 projected PPG
2) Kendra Alt	New Whiteland (2nd)	72.864 projected PPG
3) Micki Rodenbush	Indianapolis (4th)	44.837 projected PPG
4) William Pickering	Indianapolis (4th)	41.329 projected PPG
5) Julia Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	19.257 projected PPG

Detailed Quizzer PPS Statistics
---- Details may not have been available for all games in which a quizzer played (indicated in the ALL column) ----
**** Not eligible for All Tournament Team unless #GP is at least 4 ****

Name	Team	PPG	ALL	PPS	pPPG	#GP	%C	%IC	#QO	#C	#IC	%I	%NI	%RR	%Pts
Benjamin Stirnemann	New Whiteland (2nd)	91.250	Yes	31.100	92.323	8	79.59	64.00	1	4.88	2.00	39.13	52.17	8.70	79.52
Shanyah Plummer	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	87.500	Yes	25.271	88.448	6	96.15	94.12	0	4.17	2.67	62.03	22.78	15.19	93.18
Austin Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	68.333	Yes	26.459	80.106	6	77.50	61.90	1	5.17	2.17	37.33	41.33	21.33	75.00
Kendra Alt	New Whiteland (2nd)	70.000	Yes	21.183	72.864	8	71.93	64.86	0	5.12	3.00	51.28	39.74	8.97	65.43
Micki Rodenbush	Indianapolis (4th)	46.250	Yes	12.810	44.837	4	57.69	50.00	0	3.75	1.75	13.04	43.48	43.48	51.16
William Pickering	Indianapolis (4th)	40.000	Yes	17.701	41.329	4	82.35	60.00	1	3.50	0.75	13.33	86.67	0.00	75.00
Ethan Strieper	South Bend (Tied 5th)	18.333	Yes	6.127	21.444	3	60.00	66.67	0	2.00	0.67	45.45	54.55	0.00	56.25
Julia Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	15.833	Yes	5.502	19.257	6	81.82	100.00	0	1.50	0.50	31.58	10.53	57.89	78.57
Abigail Blubaugh	Danville 1 (3rd)	10.000	Yes	2.857	10.000	4	83.33	100.00	0	1.25	0.25	25.00	75.00	0.00	71.43
Jaira Vega	Valparaiso (Tied 7th)	5.000	Yes	1.429	5.000	2	100.00	0.00	0	0.50	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	100.00
Jackson Adams	Danville 2 (Tied 5th)	3.333	Yes	0.925	3.236	3	50.00	0.00	0	0.67	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	42.86
Ana Tobias	Elkhart (Tied 9th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Bethany Eaton	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Siarra Morphew	Danville 2 (Tied 5th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	3	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Sammy Blubaugh	Danville 1 (3rd)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	4	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Conner Starkey	New Palestine (Tied 9th)	-999.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	0	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Makayla Faulk	New Palestine (Tied 9th)	-999.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	0	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
David Khatthevong	South Bend (Tied 5th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	3	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Manisha Parrish	Valparaiso (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Damian Hayes	South Bend (Tied 5th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	3	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Elisha Spears	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	50.00	0.00	0	0.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	33.33
Hannah Hedges	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Isaac Hedges	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Aaron Eaton	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	Yes	0.000	0.000	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Summer Cooper	Elkhart (Tied 9th)	-7.500	Yes	-2.344	-8.203	2	0.00	0.00	0	0.00	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	0.00

Note that all of these statistics except PPG are calculated only from questions up to the point each game was locked.
PPG - the normal (non-PPS) average points per game for this quizzer in this tournament
ALL - 'f' means some game data is unavailable, so statistics are not based on all games in which this quizzer played
PPS - the percentage of the total points that the quizzer scored while the game was still competitive
pPPG - projected PPG represents the number of points that a quizzer would score IF they were to continue quizzing at the pace that they were when the game was locked; whether they would quiz out does affect this value
#GP - the number of games played by this quizzer for which PPS statistics are available
%C - the percentage of all questions answered correctly by this quizzer
%IC - the percentage of interrupted questions answered correctly by this quizzer
NQO - the total number of times this quizzer has quizzed out in this tournament
#C - the average number of correct responses by this quizzer per game
#IC - the average number of interrupted correct responses by this quizzer per game
%I - percent interruptions is of total points scored by this quizzer via responses (bonuses/fouls excluded)
%NI - percent non-interruptions is of total points scored by this quizzer
%RR - percent re-reads is of total points scored by this quizzer (note that sum of %I, %NI, and %RR is 100%)
%Pts - percentage of the points they attempted and got correct

More Detailed (10-20-30) Quizzer PPS Statistics

Name	Team	pPPG	#10C	#10IC	10pts	10rr	10ni	10i	#20C	#20IC	20pts	20rr	20ni	20i	#30C	#30IC	30pts	30rr	30ni	30i
Benjamin Stirnemann	New Whiteland (2nd)	92.323	1.75	0.50	15.00	1.25	11.25	2.50	2.88	1.25	51.25	5.00	26.25	20.00	0.25	0.25	5.63	0.00	0.00	5.63
Shanyah Plummer	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	88.448	1.50	1.00	15.00	3.33	1.67	10.00	2.67	1.67	53.33	6.67	13.33	33.33	0.00	0.00	-2.50	0.00	0.00	-2.50
Austin Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	80.106	2.83	1.00	25.00	3.33	15.00	6.67	2.33	1.17	40.00	10.00	13.33	16.67	0.00	0.00	-2.50	0.00	-2.50	0.00
Kendra Alt	New Whiteland (2nd)	72.864	3.75	2.25	33.75	3.75	10.63	19.38	1.25	0.63	15.00	2.50	8.75	3.75	0.13	0.13	0.00	-1.88	0.00	1.88
Micki Rodenbush	Indianapolis (4th)	44.837	2.00	1.50	16.25	2.50	1.25	12.50	1.75	0.25	20.00	10.00	15.00	-5.00	0.00	0.00	-7.50	0.00	-3.75	-3.75
William Pickering	Indianapolis (4th)	41.329	2.50	0.50	25.00	0.00	20.00	5.00	1.00	0.25	12.50	0.00	12.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Ethan Strieper	South Bend (Tied 5th)	21.444	1.00	0.33	6.67	0.00	5.00	1.67	1.00	0.33	16.67	0.00	10.00	6.67	0.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00
Julia Barley	Hobart / Kokomo (1st)	19.257	1.17	0.50	10.83	4.17	1.67	5.00	0.33	0.00	5.00	5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Abigail Blubaugh	Danville 1 (3rd)	10.000	1.25	0.25	12.50	0.00	10.00	2.50	0.00	0.00	-2.50	0.00	-2.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Jaira Vega	Valparaiso (Tied 7th)	5.000	0.50	0.00	5.00	0.00	5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Jackson Adams	Danville 2 (Tied 5th)	3.236	0.33	0.00	1.67	0.00	1.67	0.00	0.33	0.00	6.67	0.00	6.67	0.00	0.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00
Ana Tobias	Elkhart (Tied 9th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Bethany Eaton	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Siarra Morphew	Danville 2 (Tied 5th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Sammy Blubaugh	Danville 1 (3rd)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Conner Starkey	New Palestine (Tied 9th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Makayla Faulk	New Palestine (Tied 9th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
David Khatthevong	South Bend (Tied 5th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Manisha Parrish	Valparaiso (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Damian Hayes	South Bend (Tied 5th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Elisha Spears	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.50	0.00	5.00	0.00	5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Hannah Hedges	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Isaac Hedges	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Aaron Eaton	Evansville (Tied 7th)	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Summer Cooper	Elkhart (Tied 9th)	-8.203	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	-7.50	0.00	-7.50	0.00

Note that all of these statistics are calculated only from questions up to the point each game was locked.
#10C - the average number of correct 10 point questions by this quizzer per game
#10IC - the average number of interrupted correct 10 point questions by this quizzer per game
10pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 10s
10rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 10s
10ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 10s
10i - average points scored by interrupting in the 10s
#20C - the average number of correct 20 point questions by this quizzer per game
#20IC - the average number of interrupted correct 20 point questions by this quizzer per game
20pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 20s
20rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 20s
20ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 20s
20i - average points scored by interrupting in the 20s
#30C - the average number of correct 30 point questions by this quizzer per game
#30IC - the average number of interrupted correct 30 point questions by this quizzer per game
30pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 30s
30rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 30s
30ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 30s
30i - average points scored by interrupting in the 30s

Detailed Team PPS Statistics

Team	Rank	W	L	PPS	PPS2	PAPS	PPG	EA	EA2	EAA	MRG	%C	%IC	%I	%NI	%RR	%Pts	Max	Min	NC	NIC
Hobart / Kokomo	1st	5	1	61.089	56.636	20.430	181.667	213.810	198.227	71.507	92.500	84.42	78.05	47.98	29.48	22.54	82.20	185	115	10.83	5.33
New Whiteland	2nd	6	2	56.275	51.589	19.286	171.250	196.964	180.562	67.502	73.125	75.47	64.52	44.04	47.15	8.81	72.56	200	55	10.00	5.00
Danville 1	3rd	2	2	6.672	2.857	40.649	20.000	23.352	10.000	142.273	-67.500	83.33	100.00	25.00	75.00	0.00	71.43	40	10	1.25	0.25
Indianapolis	4th	2	2	34.380	29.262	20.893	96.250	120.329	102.416	73.127	25.000	67.44	52.63	13.21	67.92	18.87	59.70	185	15	7.25	2.50
South Bend	Tied 5th	1	2	9.830	6.127	56.572	26.667	34.403	21.444	198.002	-93.333	60.00	66.67	45.45	54.55	0.00	56.25	50	5	2.00	0.67
Danville 2	Tied 5th	1	2	4.068	0.925	12.878	13.333	14.238	3.236	45.074	-25.000	50.00	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	42.86	40	-5	0.67	0.00
Valparaiso	Tied 7th	0	2	5.635	1.429	58.492	15.000	19.722	5.000	204.722	-100.000	100.00	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	100.00	20	10	0.50	0.00
Evansville	Tied 7th	0	2	4.062	0.000	54.062	10.000	14.219	0.000	189.219	-107.500	50.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	33.33	10	10	0.50	0.00
Elkhart	Tied 9th	0	2	1.491	-2.344	41.477	2.500	5.220	-8.203	145.170	-95.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	100.00	0.00	0.00	10	-5	0.00	0.00
New Palestine	Tied 9th	0	0	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	-350	350	0.00	0.00

Note that all of these statistics except PPG are calculated only from questions up to the point each game was locked.
W - Number of wins for this team
L - Number of losses for this team
PPS - the percentage of the total points that the team scored while the game was still competitive (includes bonuses and fouls)
PPS2 - the percentage of the total points that the team scored while the game was still competitive (excludes bonuses and fouls)
PAPS - the percentage of the total points that were scored against this team while the game was still competitive (includes bonuses and fouls)
PPG - the normal (non-PPS) average points per game for this team in this tournament
EA - extrapolated average represents the number of points that a team would score IF they were to continue quizzing at the pace that they were when the game was locked
EA2 - extrapolated average represents the number of points that a team would score IF they were to continue quizzing at the pace that they were when the game was locked (excludes bonuses and fouls)
EAA - 'extrapolated average against' represents the number of points scored against a team IF they were to continue quizzing at the pace that they were when the game was locked
MRG - team's average margin of victory (if positive) or defeat (if negative)
%C - average percent of correct responses per game
%IC - average percent of interrupted correct responses per game
%I - percent interruptions is of total points scored by this team via responses (bonuses/fouls excluded)
%NI - percent non-interruptions is of total points scored by this team
%RR - percent re-reads is of total points scored by this team (note that sum of %I, %NI, and %RR is 100%)
%Pts - percentage of the points they attempted and got correct
Max - team's highest final score
Min - team's lowest final score
NC - average number of correct responses per game
NIC - average number of interrupted correct responses per game

More Detailed (10-20-30) Team PPS Statistics

Team	Rank	10pts	10rr	10ni	10i	20pts	20rr	20ni	20i	30pts	30rr	30ni	30i
Hobart / Kokomo	1st	50.83	10.83	18.33	21.67	98.33	21.67	26.67	50.00	-5.00	0.00	-2.50	-2.50
New Whiteland	2nd	48.75	5.00	21.88	21.88	66.25	7.50	35.00	23.75	5.63	-1.88	0.00	7.50
Danville 1	3rd	12.50	0.00	10.00	2.50	-2.50	0.00	-2.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Indianapolis	4th	41.25	2.50	21.25	17.50	32.50	10.00	27.50	-5.00	-7.50	0.00	-3.75	-3.75
South Bend	Tied 5th	6.67	0.00	5.00	1.67	16.67	0.00	10.00	6.67	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00
Danville 2	Tied 5th	1.67	0.00	1.67	0.00	6.67	0.00	6.67	0.00	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00
Valparaiso	Tied 7th	5.00	0.00	5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Evansville	Tied 7th	5.00	0.00	5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	-5.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Elkhart	Tied 9th	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	-7.50	0.00	-7.50	0.00
New Palestine	Tied 9th	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Note that all of these statistics are calculated only from questions up to the point each game was locked.
10pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 10s
10rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 10s
10ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 10s
10i - average points scored by interrupting in the 10s
20pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 20s
20rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 20s
20ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 20s
20i - average points scored by interrupting in the 20s
30pts - overall average points scored by this team in the 30s
30rr - average points scored on re-reads in the 30s
30ni - average points scored by non-interrupting in the 30s
30i - average points scored by interrupting in the 30s

Home	BQTournament	Tournaments	Games	Coach Resources	Contact
Getting Started	BQQuote	Teams	Account	Links	Terms of Use
Buy	Buzzer System	Calendar	Coordinators	FAQ	Privacy Policy
Download	Mobile Apps	Event Map	Stats	Advertisements	About